Effectiveness of Mulligan “MWM” versus Spencer technique on functional ability in subjects with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint

Abstract
Background. Frozen shoulder, or adhesive capsulitis, is characterized by pain and progressive loss of both active and passive shoulder range of motion due to capsular contracture and fibrosis. The Spencer technique focuses on mobilizing the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints. The Mulligan technique combines active movement with passive accessory mobilization to achieve pain-free motion by restoring impaired accessory glide.
Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of Mulligan “MWM” versus the Spencer technique in patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint using range of motion (ROM) and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).
Methods. Forty subjects meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. The procedure was explained in detail, and informed consent was obtained before initiating the study. Pre- and post-test values were measured using ROM and SPADI. Participants were divided into two groups: Mulligan “MWM” with exercise (n = 20), and the Spencer technique with exercise (n = 20). Both groups received arm circles, pendulum stretch, towel stretch, wand exercise, wall climbing, and upper body stretch, three days a week for six weeks (2 sets of 10 repetitions with a 10-second hold).
Results. The data were statistically analyzed using an unpaired t-test. The Mulligan “MWM” group showed significantly greater improvement (p < 0.01) in pain reduction and functional ability compared to the Spencer technique, as measured by ROM and SPADI.
Conclusion. Mulligan “MWM” is more effective than the Spencer technique, when combined with exercise, in reducing pain and improving functional ability in individuals with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint.

Key words
adhesive capsulitis, range of motion, SPADI, Mulligan “MWM”, Spencer technique