Constitutional Guarantees and Judicial Activism: A Critical Analysis of the Evolution of Women's Rights in India
AKHIL, SAJEEV and ANUSREE, J (2026) Constitutional Guarantees and Judicial Activism: A Critical Analysis of the Evolution of Women's Rights in India. FastForward Justice’s Law Journal, 6 (2): 17526. pp. 47-70. ISSN 2581-6713
CONSTI~4.PDF - Published Version
Download (7MB)
Abstract
The Indian Constitution, adopted in 1950, enshrines a vision of gender equality through its fundamental rights provisions and directive principles, laying a robust normative foundation for women's rights. Yet the translation of these constitutional promises into lived realities has been neither linear nor uncontested. This paper examines the evolution of women's rights in India through a multi-dimensional lens, analysing the interplay between constitutional mandates, legislative interventions, and judicial activism. Drawing on landmark Supreme Court decisions, transformative legislative enactments, and the progressive use of Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the study interrogates whether the Indian legal system has adequately discharged its constitutional obligation to secure gender justice.
The paper traces the historical trajectory of women's rights from the colonial era through post-independence legislative developments, evaluating how Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21 of the Constitution have been interpreted and expanded by the judiciary to combat patriarchal norms entrenched in personal laws, workplace practices, and public life. A central focus is the role of the Supreme Court in deploying the doctrine of substantive equality — as opposed to mere formal equality — to strike down discriminatory laws and create new rights regimes, exemplified by decisions such as Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, Shayara Bano v. Union of India, and Joseph Shine v. Union of India. The paper further evaluates the contribution of Directive Principles of State Policy, particularly Articles 39, 42, and 46, in shaping progressive legislation on maternity benefits, equal remuneration, and prohibition of child marriage.
The paper concludes that while Indian courts have pioneered transformative jurisprudence on gender justice, structural gaps persist, and a sustained convergence of legislative reform, executive accountability, and social mobilisation is indispensable to the fulfilment of the constitutional promise of equality for women in India.
Keywords: Gender Justice, Constitutional Equality, Public Interest Litigation, Judicial Activism, Women's Rights
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Legal Studies > Administrative Law |
| Domains: | Legal Studies |
| Depositing User: | Mr IR Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 11 May 2026 10:19 |
| Last Modified: | 12 May 2026 07:47 |
| URI: | https://ir.vistas.ac.in/id/eprint/17526 |
